I have been using Terraform over the last few months, having not used it in anger for quite a while↗ since the projects I have been working on have been more suitable for using Ansible↗ .

However, as I am doing more and more with Microsoft Azure, I found the Ansible modules a little lacking, plus for someone of the projects I have had to use an orchestration tool which can natively run on Windows.

Doing a little reading, I decided that I should be using modules so that i didn’t have to repeat lots of code. While this approach has mostly worked the current version of Terraform, 0.11.x, does have a few annoyances.

For example, in Azure, you have to create a resource group and then place resources you are launching in the group you have configured. Great I thought to myself I will just create a module which generates the resource group and then use an output to reference the resource group later in my plan.

The code for the module looked something like the following;

Terraform Quirks 1/4
resource "azurerm_resource_group" "resource_group" {  name     = "${var.resource_group_name}"  location = "${var.location}"  tags     = "${var.tags}"}variable "name" {  description = "The name of the resource group we want to use"  default     = ""}variable "location" {  description = "The location/region where we are crrating the resource"  default     = ""}variable "tags" {  description = "The tags to associate the resource we are creating"  type        = "map"  default     = {}}output "rg_name" {  description = "The name of the newly created resource group"  value       = "${azurerm_resource_group.resource_group.name}"}

I was hoping that this meant that my main.tf could look like;

Terraform Quirks 2/4
module "application-rg" {  source   = "modules/vnet"  name     = "${var.resource_group_name}"  location = "${var.location}"  tags     = "${merge(var.default_tags, map("type","resource"))}"}module "application-vnet" {  source              = "modules/vnet"  resource_group_name = "${module.application-rg.rg_name}"  location            = "${var.location}"  tags                = "${merge(var.default_tags, map("type","network"))}"  vnet_name           = "${module.application-rg.rg_name}-vnet"  address_space       = "10.10.0.0/16"}

While it worked, it did error a lot of the time from a standing start, this was because by Terraform was trying to create the vNet before the Resource Group had been created.

No problem I thought to myself — I remembered from the last time I used Terraform that there are resource dependencies in the form of . However, after much reading, I discovered that depends_on isn’t yet supported for modules — it is on the road map though.

Because of this I had to rejig my main.tf file to look like the following;

Terraform Quirks 3/4
resource "azurerm_resource_group" "resource_group" {  name     = "${var.resource_group_name}"  location = "${var.location}"  tags     = "${merge(var.default_tags, map("type","resource"))}"}module "application-vnet" {  source              = "modules/vnet"  resource_group_name = "${azurerm_resource_group.resource_group.name}"  location            = "${var.location}"  tags                = "${merge(var.default_tags, map("type","network"))}"  vnet_name           = "${azurerm_resource_group.resource_group.name}-vnet"  address_space       = "10.10.0.0/16"}

This was not the end of the world, but as the documentation was pushing me down the module route, it was annoying.

The next lot of problem I had was with trying to use count with lists which had either been dynamically generated from another module or where hard coded. After much searching StackOverflow↗ and GitHub issues↗ I found workarounds for most of my issues, such as the following (which has been abridged);

Terraform Quirks 4/4
resource "azurerm_network_security_group" "nsg" {  resource_group_name = "${var.resource_group_name}"  location            = "${var.location}"  tags                = "${var.tags}"  name                = "${var.name}"}locals {  rules_locked_down_no = "${length(var.rules_locked_down)}"  rules_groups_no      = "${length(var.rules_groups)}"  rules_open_no        = "${length(var.rules_open)}"}resource "azurerm_network_security_rule" "rules_locked_down" {  count                       = "${local.rules_locked_down_no != 0 ? length(var.rules_locked_down) : 0}"  name                        = "${lookup(var.rules_locked_down[count.index], "name", "default_rule_name")}"  priority                    = "${lookup(var.rules_locked_down[count.index], "priority")}"  direction                   = "${lookup(var.rules_locked_down[count.index], "direction", "Any")}"  resource_group_name         = "${var.resource_group_name}"  network_security_group_name = "${azurerm_network_security_group.nsg.name}"}resource "azurerm_network_security_rule" "rules_open" {  count                       = "${local.rules_open_no != 0 ? length(var.rules_open) : 0}"  name                        = "${lookup(var.rules_open[count.index], "name", "default_rule_name")}"  priority                    = "${lookup(var.rules_open[count.index], "priority")}"  direction                   = "${lookup(var.rules_open[count.index], "direction", "Any")}"  resource_group_name         = "${var.resource_group_name}"  network_security_group_name = "${azurerm_network_security_group.nsg.name}"}resource "azurerm_network_security_rule" "rules_groups" {  count                                 = "${local.rules_groups_no != 0 ? length(var.rules_groups) : 0}"  name                                  = "${lookup(var.rules_groups[count.index], "name", "default_rule_name")}"  priority                              = "${lookup(var.rules_groups[count.index], "priority")}"  direction                             = "${lookup(var.rules_groups[count.index], "direction", "Any")}"  access                                = "${lookup(var.rules_groups[count.index], "access", "Allow")}"  resource_group_name                   = "${var.resource_group_name}"  network_security_group_name           = "${azurerm_network_security_group.nsg.name}"}

Here I had to use the locals to count the number of items in the list I was passing through so that it could be then be used by count.

This is something I would have expected to have worked when I first wrote the module as the syntax made sense, however, when I ran the original code this was pretty much the face I pulled when all I got was a message saying that the “count cannot be computed.”;

See this GitHub issue for more detail↗ on why it didn’t work and what changes have been made in Terraform to fix it.

Most of the problems I came across while I have been revisiting Terraform appear to be either being fixed or having the ground-work laid for a fix in Terraform 0.12 which should be released very soon.

Until it is, I will be waiting — thinking about all of the work arounds I will have to undo.

For more information on Terraform 0.12 the following video is a good place to start;

Or the following blog posts from Hashicorp which go to make up a preview of Terraform 0.12↗ ;

Update 16/02/2019


it is an interesting insight into what is going to behind the scenes to get this release out of the gate.